[
 {
  "id": "TG-A",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (cognitive ability tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "between .22 and .26",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sackett and his team published another large meta-analysis in December 2023",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "author and year named; a 2023 paper, not the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "625f6e8f2c758bf5",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-backed-best-practices-cognitive-ability-testing/",
    "sha256": "9f032cd0f0bcfc077fac5567ea4e1437d1b73f5eeee9958947ca7e103f0d7611",
    "quotation": "They summarized more than 130 studies and concluded that the average validity coefficient of cognitive ability tests\u00a0is even lower: between .22 and .26.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 65
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-B",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (structured interviews)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".42",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "explicit attribution of the number to the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "3091f9bf37828d5e",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "quotation": "For instance, the mean validity of .42 found for structured interviews by Sackett et al. (2022) is the average of the validity coefficient values reported by different studies included in their meta-analysis.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 96
   },
   {
    "id": "4e322f6ea0a394ac",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "quotation": "For example, structured interviews, which is at the top of the list in terms of a mean validity of .42, have an 80% credibility interval ranging from .18 to .66.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 102
   },
   {
    "id": "b37e22ddf518fd78",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "quotation": "Thus, the validity of structured interviews should really be viewed as the \u201cvalidity coefficient is .42, plus or minus .24\u201d.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 103
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-C",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (empirically keyed biodata)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".38",
  "comparator": "structured interviews .42",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sackett and colleagues",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the page attributes the comparison to Sackett et al. (2022); value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2cfbe38e2481a6c5",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "quotation": "For example, Sackett and colleagues found that structured interviews have higher mean validity than empirically keyed biodata (.42 versus .38).",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 108
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-D",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (contextualized Conscientiousness)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".25",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "explicit attribution; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "734076390839d332",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "quotation": "By introducing this distinction, Sackett et al. (2022) were able to narrow the credibility intervals so much that the contextualized measure of Conscientiousness has an average validity of .25 \u2013 with both the lower and the upper bound of the 80% credibility interval sitting at .25 as well.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 106
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-E",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (combination of hiring tools)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "up to .47 on average",
  "comparator": "single tools",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sacket et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "explicit attribution to the 2022 paper (author spelled Sacket on the page)"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "f98bdf91a80908d1",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "quotation": "For example, Sacket et al. (2022) showed that the validity coefficient can reach up to .47 on average based on the combination of hiring tools they considered.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 133
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-F",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predictive validity of hiring decisions (structured versus unstructured interviews)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "up to 40%",
  "comparator": "unstructured interviews",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "a comprehensive study by the International Journal of Selection and Assessment; the page's Sources list carries one IJSA entry: Rizi and Roulin (2023), doi 10.1111/ijsa.12448",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "journal named inline; the Sources list entry for that journal is titled on asynchronous video interviews; mapped by journal name"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "3c8d22a6515d7394",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/structured-interviews-frame-of-reference-training/",
    "sha256": "60095ecea8c83eca1a51c3e63d908ddecfd98403b192712f350ec8ad4f349181",
    "quotation": "According to a comprehensive study by the International Journal of Selection and Assessment, structured interviews consistently outperform unstructured ones, delivering impressive figures to support their adoption. 5 benefits of adopting structured interviews Improved Predictive Validity: Structured interviews have been shown to increase the predictive validity of hiring decisions by up to 40% compared to unstructured interviews.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 121
   }
  ],
  "note": "relative percentage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-G",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "quality hires (employer survey: make quality hires every time)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "91%",
  "comparator": "82% skills tests without multi-measure; 67% no skills testing",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Our research shows, linking to The State of Skills-Based Hiring 2025",
    "link": "/skills-based-hiring/state-of-skills-based-hiring-2025/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor report named and linked"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5bfdd96d48d17122",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/pre-employment-technical-aptitude-tests-guide/",
    "sha256": "18627db9a196356e6ec3cc819583bec45e1c1be929b34b230ccade59e619d207",
    "quotation": "Our research shows that multi-measure skills-based assessments are the most accurate predictors of job success. 91% of employers who use this method make quality hires every time, compared to 82% of employers who use skills tests (but not multi-measure) and just 67% of employers who don't use any form of skills testing.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 189
   }
  ],
  "note": "survey-based share; criterion and comparators stated",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-H",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "mis-hires (companies that put skills first)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "2 in 3 companies reduced their mis-hires",
  "comparator": "none stated",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Report, linking to The State of Skills-Based Hiring 2025",
    "link": "/skills-based-hiring/state-of-skills-based-hiring-2025/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor report linked from the banner"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0f1a1b9b33005a53-1",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/",
    "sha256": "d959e57b69a1f6b42758d57d6a8fc2830430dde031a7fa192caf2726dbae6fc8",
    "quotation": "See what happens when you \u2028put skills first 2 in 3 companies reduced their mis-hires Report 400% more candidates assessed Case study 80% reduction in cost and time-to-hire Case study 2 in 3 companies reduced their mis-hires Report 400% more candidates assessed Case study 80% reduction in cost and time-to-hire Case study POWERED BY AI, BACKED BY SCIENCE Validated assessments built on decades of psychometric theory.",
    "claim_span": "2 in 3 companies reduced their mis-hires",
    "position": 5
   }
  ],
  "note": "the same banner shows 400% more candidates assessed and 80% reduction in cost and time-to-hire, which are commercial outcomes outside the primary dataset The two case-study cards in the same block (400% more candidates assessed; 80% reduction in cost and time-to-hire) are commercial outcomes, materialised as child rows outside N, M and K.",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-I",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "new-hire retention (Orbit Technologies)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "improves new hire retention by 50%",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "customer testimonial headline on the solutions page (Orbit Technologies)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "no document or study cited in the captured page text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "f1dbdb4ad0dc71d2",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/solutions/technical-hiring/",
    "sha256": "8c6ace821328e5cdaf45b70e682269ee662de6d847f99f5711f8dad84bc58fd9",
    "quotation": "Karthik Balaram Donthi, GM Human Resources, Orbit Technologies Brands find top technical talent with TestGorilla Orbit Technologies reduces bias and improves new hire retention by 50% with TestGorilla Orbit Technologies relies on its team of highly skilled engineers to deliver solutions for clients around the globe in regions such as the United States, Asia, and Europe.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 11
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-J",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "new employee retention (LILAB)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "up to 90%",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "customer case card on the solutions page (LILAB)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "no document cited in the captured text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "416353dc083fb9e0",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/solutions/technical-hiring/",
    "sha256": "8c6ace821328e5cdaf45b70e682269ee662de6d847f99f5711f8dad84bc58fd9",
    "quotation": "Read more LILAB boosts new employee retention up to 90% Based in Peru, Lima Innovation Lab (LILAB) is a leading software company dedicated to creating innovative digital solutions.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 12
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-K",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "productivity of employees hired with the tests (Click&Boat)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "30% more productive",
  "comparator": "the rest of the team",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Click&Boat case study",
    "link": "/case-studies/clickboat-high-quality-candidates-testgorilla/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study linked inline"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2b52c84a80e6efb7",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/construct-validity/",
    "sha256": "854a51219f1ff9a9de9bda8ae156499c0827d5dc3196a0bd5fbd9f85a859acee",
    "quotation": "To make things even better, employees hired with our skills tests are 30% more productive than the rest of the team.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 72
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-L",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "employees who exceed performance goals (organisations using technical aptitude assessments)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "24% more likely to have employees who exceed performance goals",
  "comparator": "organisations not using them",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Aberdeen, The pros and cons of pre-employment testing (blog post)",
    "link": "https://www.aberdeen.com/blogposts/the-pros-and-cons-of-pre-employment-screenings/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "organisation and stable document linked"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2bd9d7cb47d7e978",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/psychometric-properties/",
    "sha256": "3eef3c2559f3d69c004849fc3dd9b63cfe05c10ae540e76f2bc37964c9da4501",
    "quotation": "Research supports talent assessments because companies that use them are 24% more likely to hire employees who exceed performance goals.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 80
   },
   {
    "id": "0afa6ef693449822-1",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/pre-employment-technical-aptitude-tests-guide/",
    "sha256": "18627db9a196356e6ec3cc819583bec45e1c1be929b34b230ccade59e619d207",
    "quotation": "Research shows that organizations that use technical aptitude assessments for employment are 24% more likely to have employees who exceed performance goals and a 39% lower turnover rate.",
    "claim_span": "24% more likely to have employees who exceed performance goals",
    "position": 186
   }
  ],
  "note": "rows 57 and 124 both carry the 24% figure; row 124 is the first claim of a two-claim passage (child row -1)",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-M",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "mis-hires (tech employers using skills-based hiring)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "90% of tech employers reduce mis-hires",
  "comparator": "none stated",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "The State of Skills-Based Hiring in Tech 2024",
    "link": "/skills-based-hiring/state-of-skills-based-hiring-in-tech-2024/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor report named and linked as the source"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5029b783fd00df23",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/top-coding-skills-tests-non-technical-recruiters/",
    "sha256": "1388bfee8dc23456efcf299603f6ff26b4edb8e4fdb7a2ea73a46cd586754205",
    "quotation": "Doing so will help you filter out unqualified candidates and, thanks to the knowledge of your candidates\u2019 skills, give you more discussion points during the interview. 90% of tech employers reduce mis-hires when they use skills-based hiring.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 147
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-N",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "mis-hires (Ocean Outdoor UK)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "reduce mis-hires by 44%",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Ocean Outdoor UK case study",
    "link": "/case-studies/ocean-outdooruk-revamps-hiring-screens-candidates-faster",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study linked inline"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "15831e4002dcfcff",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/psychometric-testing/",
    "sha256": "b985f50ae82dc6107981a9fd371fe22cd58b739e17a391e1304ff46261f88593",
    "quotation": "This strategic use of psychometric testing enabled the organization to shorten the lengthy selection process and reduce mis-hires by 44%.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 201
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-A",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (validities of the top five selection methods)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "about 25% lower than previously reported",
  "comparator": "previous research",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the new paper produced by Professor Sackett and his colleagues",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "author named without title, year or link"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "3fa7275202bbcf99",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/blog/updates-employee-selection-science",
    "sha256": "51f3fa08bf22b65ebbcbe626cb5a31b373e72b8488bcc3c3e80bd34198d39418",
    "quotation": "Looking just at the top five methods shown above, the new paper finds validities that are about 25% lower than those reported in previous research.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 24
   }
  ],
  "note": "relative percentage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-B",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (most selection methods)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "between 0.20 and 0.50",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "c195bf6f9eb059e4",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/blog/updates-employee-selection-science",
    "sha256": "51f3fa08bf22b65ebbcbe626cb5a31b373e72b8488bcc3c3e80bd34198d39418",
    "quotation": "Most selection methods have correlations with performance between 0.20 and 0.50.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 27
   }
  ],
  "note": "no source mapped; the paragraph describes meta-analyses generally",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-C",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "job performance (productivity ratings) for the Criteria Basic Skills Test",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".26",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Criteria case study: market research firm uses Criteria to predict employee productivity (page and PDF)",
    "link": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/files/Criteria-CaseStudy-MarketResearch-CallCenter-CBST.pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study reporting its own validation study"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "6a120bca51f36f52",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/case-study/market-research-firm-uses-criteria-predict-employee-productivity",
    "sha256": "8cf728cbdbf4e7c95a799aacf87b99a6f82384058e664f6393ec17281fa07ad2",
    "quotation": "Additionally, it was determined that the validity coefficient between test scores and job performance was .26.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 45
   },
   {
    "id": "971a9fa5aa0aeb4d",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/files/Criteria-CaseStudy-MarketResearch-CallCenter-CBST.pdf",
    "sha256": "97e09ce336b4e5a35ce4abb18126f3485881d91bc98329a942fe9db9685cdd87",
    "quotation": "and job performance was 0.26.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 233
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-D",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "productivity (employees passing the CBST versus failing)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "63% more productive",
  "comparator": "failing scores",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the same case study",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study reporting its own study"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "7d28b37ec356737f",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/case-study/market-research-firm-uses-criteria-predict-employee-productivity",
    "sha256": "8cf728cbdbf4e7c95a799aacf87b99a6f82384058e664f6393ec17281fa07ad2",
    "quotation": "The study showed that employees who passed the test (ie who achieved a raw score of 28 or better) were 63% more productive than were employees who received failing scores.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 43
   },
   {
    "id": "6015d662c1bd11e0",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/files/Criteria-CaseStudy-MarketResearch-CallCenter-CBST.pdf",
    "sha256": "97e09ce336b4e5a35ce4abb18126f3485881d91bc98329a942fe9db9685cdd87",
    "quotation": "productive than          achieved a raw score of 28 or better) were 63% more productive than",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 229
   }
  ],
  "note": "relative percentage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-E",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "performance rankings of fair or better (passing versus failing the CBST)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "89% versus 50%",
  "comparator": "failing scores",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the same case study",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study reporting its own study"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5c45b5cbfdea1dfd",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/case-study/market-research-firm-uses-criteria-predict-employee-productivity",
    "sha256": "8cf728cbdbf4e7c95a799aacf87b99a6f82384058e664f6393ec17281fa07ad2",
    "quotation": "Moreover,\u00a0among employees who received failing scores, 50% received performance rankings of \"fair\" or better; for employees who passed the test, 89% received performance rankings of fair or better.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 44
   },
   {
    "id": "88bbfea944b37bba",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/files/Criteria-CaseStudy-MarketResearch-CallCenter-CBST.pdf",
    "sha256": "97e09ce336b4e5a35ce4abb18126f3485881d91bc98329a942fe9db9685cdd87",
    "quotation": "Moreover, among employees who received failing scores, 50% received performance",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 231
   }
  ],
  "note": "The case-study page also renders the 89% versus 50% comparison as a chart image (raw/images-2026-09-02, MarketResearch-CallCenter-CBST-Chart2.jpg).",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-F",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (cognitive aptitude tests versus unstructured job interviews)",
  "metric_type": "relative multiplier",
  "value": "1.6x as predictive",
  "comparator": "unstructured job interviews",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "26c8ebaefa047881-1",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/what-are-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "86df04df5290b8a53a9582517433dffbbeefe78ba03a562ae52db9ba4f9d326a",
    "quotation": "In fact, research demonstrates that cognitive aptitude tests are far better at predicting job performance than other common hiring criteria \u2013 aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews and four times as predictive as job experience.",
    "claim_span": "aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews",
    "position": 210
   },
   {
    "id": "1aa174e7e8885129-1",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/what-are-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "86df04df5290b8a53a9582517433dffbbeefe78ba03a562ae52db9ba4f9d326a",
    "quotation": "Figure 1:\u00a0When it comes to predicting job performance, aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews and four times as predictive as experience.",
    "claim_span": "aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews",
    "position": 211
   }
  ],
  "note": "\"research demonstrates\" with no citation on the page",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-G",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "productivity (sales per hour) of associates passing the CBST",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "20% more productive",
  "comparator": "low test scores",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "leading apparel retailer increases sales (case study)",
    "link": "/case-study/leading-apparel-retailer-increases-sales-hireselect",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study linked inline"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "77fedf342d33c929",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/the-benefits-using-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "957b2d267585d85794b34c6b74b0ae930129df0573d833bbf4fde0cb960decdb",
    "quotation": "In other words, those salespeople who passed the test were on average 20% more productive than those who didn't.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 217
   }
  ],
  "note": "relative percentage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-H",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "turnover (call centre using an aptitude, personality, computer skills and typing test battery)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "reduce turnover by 65%",
  "comparator": "before the assessments",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "call center reduces turnover (case study)",
    "link": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/case-study/call-center-reduces-turnover-b",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study linked inline"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8496ae8c95bc28dc",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/the-benefits-using-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "957b2d267585d85794b34c6b74b0ae930129df0573d833bbf4fde0cb960decdb",
    "quotation": "With these assessments in place, the company was able to reduce turnover by 65% in just one year.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 218
   },
   {
    "id": "d339a3eebc8c9f94",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/",
    "sha256": "572ddc7b7bb0fb11c7fc384213793d1e938481fd6390194ddd770f81a76c3255",
    "quotation": "65% reduction in turnover \u00a0 Read More",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 4
   }
  ],
  "note": "candidate 147 is the homepage case card with the same figure",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-I",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "training completion and licensing exam pass (CCAT top-tier scorers)",
  "metric_type": "predictive-accuracy percentage",
  "value": "100% completed training and passed",
  "comparator": "lower-scoring groups declined steeply",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "The definitive guide to the validity of pre-employment tests, Figure 5 (the guide's own study description)",
    "link": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/what-are-pre-employment-tests",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor document describing its own study"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2ad731b1636e4efe",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/the-benefits-using-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "957b2d267585d85794b34c6b74b0ae930129df0573d833bbf4fde0cb960decdb",
    "quotation": "Of those who scored in the highest tier, 100% completed their training and passed the licensing test.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 220
   },
   {
    "id": "ee205073cb4bdf0e",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/the-benefits-using-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "957b2d267585d85794b34c6b74b0ae930129df0573d833bbf4fde0cb960decdb",
    "quotation": "Of the group that scored above average on the CCAT, 100% completed training.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 221
   }
  ],
  "note": "Recoded after the gate 2 fifth run: training completion and licensing-exam pass rates are completion and pass rates, which SCOPE lists as not validity claims; the case-study outcome is recorded outside N, M and K, consistent with the training-completion chart on the same page.",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-K",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "revenue from sales (case card)",
  "metric_type": "relative multiplier",
  "value": "7x more revenue from sales",
  "comparator": "none stated",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "homepage case study card (Read More)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study card linking to a case study page"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0a0916621878b415",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/",
    "sha256": "572ddc7b7bb0fb11c7fc384213793d1e938481fd6390194ddd770f81a76c3255",
    "quotation": "7x more revenue from sales \u00a0 Read More",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 5
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-L",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "hiring success rate (case card)",
  "metric_type": "predictive-accuracy percentage",
  "value": "90% hiring success rate",
  "comparator": "none stated",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "homepage case study card (Read More)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor case study card linking to a case study page"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "a9c1695a957f7478",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/",
    "sha256": "572ddc7b7bb0fb11c7fc384213793d1e938481fd6390194ddd770f81a76c3255",
    "quotation": "90% hiring success rate \u00a0 Read More",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 7
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-A",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (contextualized Conscientiousness)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.25",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "9c65dfd4b3701e85",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/technical-skills-tests-vs-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "3b0b2673afa2f94e8be7b2ebaf8a3985e0551c46a5a521b7c576046831c480ca",
    "quotation": "The personality trait to show the most meaningful amount of predictive validity across job types is the Conscientiousness trait from the Big Five test, when contextualized for work \u2014 with a validity coefficient of 0.25.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 11
   }
  ],
  "note": "no citation on the sentence; the same page links Sackett's 2022 meta-analysis for a different sentence",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-B",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (contextualized Neuroticism, emotional stability)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.23",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "01ee39ce57a55dab-1",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/technical-skills-tests-vs-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "3b0b2673afa2f94e8be7b2ebaf8a3985e0551c46a5a521b7c576046831c480ca",
    "quotation": "Contextualized Neuroticism (or \u201cemotional stability\u201d) and Extraversion can both have a small correlative impact on hiring, with validity coefficients of 0.23 and 0.21, respectively.",
    "claim_span": "Contextualized Neuroticism (or \"emotional stability\") ... validity coefficients of 0.23",
    "position": 12
   }
  ],
  "note": "as ES-A",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-C",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "future job performance (job-relevant technical tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "above 0.40",
  "comparator": "personality tests",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Sackett's meta-analysis",
    "link": "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357440267_Revisiting_meta-analytic_estimates_of_validity_in_personnel_selection",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "linked title is the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "4a7cea9518b00792",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/technical-skills-tests-vs-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "3b0b2673afa2f94e8be7b2ebaf8a3985e0551c46a5a521b7c576046831c480ca",
    "quotation": "To put it plainly: job-relevant technical tests (like work samples or knowledge assessments) are much better predictors of future job performance than personality tests, all ranking above 0.40 for validity coefficients.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 14
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-D",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "revenue per employee (companies using skills testing)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "33% higher revenue per employee",
  "comparator": "companies not using it",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "a Gallup poll",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "organisation named without title, year or link"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "948f45617ffd230a-1",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/why-reliability-and-validity-are-so-important-for-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "8c363dfabcf58f9c222bf79f89f5e02930616b168c455a8c1b6f80f8c5986f07",
    "quotation": "The results of a Gallup poll showed companies that use skills testing average of 33% higher revenue per employee and saw a 17% increase in productivity. \u200d However, skills tests do not tell you whether a candidate is a good fit for the job or your corporate culture.",
    "claim_span": "33% higher revenue per employee",
    "position": 17
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-E",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "turnover within seven months (customer testimonial, CCRI)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "27% before, 17% after",
  "comparator": "before eSkill",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "customer testimonial (Rachel Gustofson, talent specialist)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "a quotation, no study or document"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "e978d8bb6a2ddd06",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/",
    "sha256": "9bc0ea5e5e2d5a5edffc7ffb8c1fada3b76baa94bebebda5a3df97829caf7ef7",
    "quotation": "\u201cPrior to eSkill, we had 27% turnover with the people we hired within the immediate 7 month time frame.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 2
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "EM-A",
  "product": "EmployTest",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "job performance (skills testing versus interviews alone)",
  "metric_type": "relative multiplier",
  "value": "5x better",
  "comparator": "interviews alone",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "(Research Gate)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "a site name in parentheses, no author, title or year"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "36e84a70aa65e6ea",
    "url": "https://employtest.com/",
    "sha256": "f46da598e74ec2cde3f174165bdd5abd6fcb707081216dda130998eb587ee757",
    "quotation": "Skills testing predicts job performance 5x better than interviews alone.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 1
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "DI-A",
  "product": "Discovered (The Hire Talent)",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "which employees will succeed on the job",
  "metric_type": "predictive-accuracy percentage",
  "value": "up to 90% success",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "\"30+ years of validating our assessments\"; a double-blind method described in prose",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "no document, study or sample named"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "fa192aa896ec5ba3",
    "url": "https://www.preemploymentassessments.com/manual/assessment-validation/",
    "sha256": "d7ced37a6f1bb85945c109959de9e1876f3b05765281f9c27d00fdcdb395ae9c",
    "quotation": "Through 30+ years of validating our assessments we are able to predict which employees will succeed on the job with up to 90% success.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 13
   },
   {
    "id": "7dc27c347094ac42",
    "url": "https://www.preemploymentassessments.com/manual/assessment-validation/",
    "sha256": "d7ced37a6f1bb85945c109959de9e1876f3b05765281f9c27d00fdcdb395ae9c",
    "quotation": "Using the double blind method we were able to predict accurately 90% of those in the blinds providing the candidate did not exaggerate or was too brutally honest filling in the questionnaire.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 21
   },
   {
    "id": "b31cfc2c27caf9c7",
    "url": "https://www.preemploymentassessments.com/manual/assessment-validation/",
    "sha256": "d7ced37a6f1bb85945c109959de9e1876f3b05765281f9c27d00fdcdb395ae9c",
    "quotation": "Yes, these assessments do what we say they will do and the accuracy rates for competency and attitude are close to 90%.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 23
   }
  ],
  "note": "candidate 668 gives 70% for 1998",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "PR-A",
  "product": "Prevue Assessments",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "job performance (criterion-related validity of the Prevue Assessments)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "generally exceed .35",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the above-noted Technical Bulletin; the Prevue Technical Manual",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor technical documents named on the page"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "37dcf8dfc0ab9d1a",
    "url": "https://www.prevuehr.com/resources/insights/how-do-you-prove-validity/",
    "sha256": "ef13a429f103b0b225944f3e8a92da8807ceb53675bd203451ac7b2d7b5bee84",
    "quotation": "You can see in the above-noted Technical Bulletin that the validity coefficients for the Prevue Assessments generally exceed .35.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 3
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "PR-B",
  "product": "Prevue Assessments",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "turnover (employees lacking the Competitive and Self-Sufficient traits)",
  "metric_type": "relative multiplier",
  "value": "over three times more likely to leave",
  "comparator": "employees with the traits",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the page's own survival analysis of 56 employees in one organisation (Science Lab: the importance of validating benchmarks)",
    "link": "https://www.prevuehr.com/resources/science-lab/the-importance-of-validating-benchmarks-to-improve-hiring/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor-reported customer study with the sample named"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "df3b7a6b9cef71ec",
    "url": "https://www.prevuehr.com/resources/science-lab/the-importance-of-validating-benchmarks-to-improve-hiring-success/",
    "sha256": "93c5301955a787028537293ebe9101370f5ebed7331ee39ac986130082acbf53",
    "quotation": "Analysis: A survival analysis revealed that employees with high \u2018Competitive\u2019 and \u2018Self-Sufficient\u2019 traits had significantly lower turnover rates; while those lacking these traits were over three times more likely to leave.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 4
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "PR-C",
  "product": "Prevue Assessments",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "voluntary turnover per one-sten increase on the Working with People scale",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "9.4% decrease",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the page's own analysis (Science Lab: how motivation predicts)",
    "link": "https://www.prevuehr.com/resources/science-lab/how-motivation-predicts",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "vendor-reported study on its own page"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "4dd4ba28991ade37",
    "url": "https://www.prevuehr.com/resources/science-lab/how-motivation-predicts-voluntary-turnover/",
    "sha256": "4924c56fa4f632cf7727abc52eae6aeae781975cfc54c2e940b6126231bc8146",
    "quotation": "In this sales environment, every one-sten increase on the Working with People scale was associated with a 9.4% decrease in voluntary turnover.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 5
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "VE-A",
  "product": "Vervoe",
  "kind": "customer-outcome",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "sales targets (candidates hired using a Vervoe assessment in one organisation)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "outperformed by 4%",
  "comparator": "none stated",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "the page's own client example",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": true,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "no document, study or organisation named"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "a71abffa7e1902eb",
    "url": "https://vervoe.com/assessment-standard-compliance/",
    "sha256": "465e4b4142dc93a2ce25b3ddb38471051617d8bae20978ce84eb3c76fcec1094",
    "quotation": "For example, candidates hired using a Vervoe assessment in one organization outperformed sales targets by 4%.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 3
   }
  ],
  "note": "",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-L2",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "turnover (organisations using technical aptitude assessments)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "39% lower turnover rate",
  "comparator": "organisations not using them",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "Aberdeen, The pros and cons of pre-employment testing (blog post)",
    "link": "https://www.aberdeen.com/blogposts/the-pros-and-cons-of-pre-employment-screenings/",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "organisation and stable document linked"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0afa6ef693449822-2",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/pre-employment-technical-aptitude-tests-guide/",
    "sha256": "18627db9a196356e6ec3cc819583bec45e1c1be929b34b230ccade59e619d207",
    "quotation": "Research shows that organizations that use technical aptitude assessments for employment are 24% more likely to have employees who exceed performance goals and a 39% lower turnover rate.",
    "claim_span": "a 39% lower turnover rate",
    "position": 186
   }
  ],
  "note": "row 124, second claim of the two-claim passage (child row -2)",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-B2",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (contextualized Extraversion)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.21",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "01ee39ce57a55dab-2",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/technical-skills-tests-vs-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "3b0b2673afa2f94e8be7b2ebaf8a3985e0551c46a5a521b7c576046831c480ca",
    "quotation": "Contextualized Neuroticism (or \u201cemotional stability\u201d) and Extraversion can both have a small correlative impact on hiring, with validity coefficients of 0.23 and 0.21, respectively.",
    "claim_span": "Extraversion ... 0.21",
    "position": 12
   }
  ],
  "note": "second claim of the split passage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "ES-D2",
  "product": "eSkill",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "test family",
  "criterion": "productivity (companies using skills testing)",
  "metric_type": "other",
  "value": "17% increase in productivity",
  "comparator": "companies not using it",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "a Gallup poll",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "organisation named without title, year or link"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "948f45617ffd230a-2",
    "url": "https://www.eskill.com/resources/blog/why-reliability-and-validity-are-so-important-for-behavioral-assessments",
    "sha256": "8c363dfabcf58f9c222bf79f89f5e02930616b168c455a8c1b6f80f8c5986f07",
    "quotation": "The results of a Gallup poll showed companies that use skills testing average of 33% higher revenue per employee and saw a 17% increase in productivity. \u200d However, skills tests do not tell you whether a candidate is a good fit for the job or your corporate culture.",
    "claim_span": "a 17% increase in productivity",
    "position": 17
   }
  ],
  "note": "second claim of the split passage",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "CR-F2",
  "product": "Criteria",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (cognitive aptitude tests versus job experience)",
  "metric_type": "relative multiplier",
  "value": "four times as predictive",
  "comparator": "job experience",
  "sources": [],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "26c8ebaefa047881-2",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/what-are-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "86df04df5290b8a53a9582517433dffbbeefe78ba03a562ae52db9ba4f9d326a",
    "quotation": "In fact, research demonstrates that cognitive aptitude tests are far better at predicting job performance than other common hiring criteria \u2013 aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews and four times as predictive as job experience.",
    "claim_span": "four times as predictive as job experience",
    "position": 210
   },
   {
    "id": "1aa174e7e8885129-2",
    "url": "https://www.criteriacorp.com/resources/definitive-guide-validity-of-preemployment-tests/what-are-pre-employment-tests",
    "sha256": "86df04df5290b8a53a9582517433dffbbeefe78ba03a562ae52db9ba4f9d326a",
    "quotation": "Figure 1:\u00a0When it comes to predicting job performance, aptitude tests are 1.6x as predictive as unstructured job interviews and four times as predictive as experience.",
    "claim_span": "four times as predictive as job experience",
    "position": 211
   }
  ],
  "note": "second claim of the split passages (text and figure caption)",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "DI-B",
  "product": "Discovered (The Hire Talent)",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "product or named instrument",
  "criterion": "which employees will succeed on the job (accuracy after adjustments in 1998)",
  "metric_type": "predictive-accuracy percentage",
  "value": "70%",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "\"30+ years of validating our assessments\"; a double-blind method described in prose",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": false,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": true,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "unresolved",
    "lineage_basis": "no document, study or sample named"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "bd6dae9864293851",
    "url": "https://www.preemploymentassessments.com/manual/assessment-validation/",
    "sha256": "d7ced37a6f1bb85945c109959de9e1876f3b05765281f9c27d00fdcdb395ae9c",
    "quotation": "Our accuracy began to rapidly increase after some more adjustments in 1998 the results improved to 70% which is an acceptable industry average for assessments.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 14
   }
  ],
  "note": "a different value from the 90% statements, so its own group",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-01",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Age)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "-0.01",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "94970e06e765827c",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 1: Age -0.01",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 74
   },
   {
    "id": "56ad6855c90baccc",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "Age                           -0.01    Candidate age has non-existent validity, so companies that",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 37
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-02",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Graphology)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.02",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8cad6e71647458c0",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 2: Graphology 0.02",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 75
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-03",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Interests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.10",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "07ad86c5b246f0ad",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 3: Interests 0.10",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 76
   },
   {
    "id": "6d912d1d403e2900-2",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "us years of education or interests (validity of 0.1) and job",
    "claim_span": "interests (validity of 0.1)",
    "position": 43
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-04",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Years of education)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.10",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0f5cf5170f734acb",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 4: Years of education 0.10",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 77
   },
   {
    "id": "6d912d1d403e2900-1",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "us years of education or interests (validity of 0.1) and job",
    "claim_span": "years of education ... (validity of 0.1)",
    "position": 43
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-05",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (T&E: point method)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.11",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "82f3f6f06854f885",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 5: T&E: point method 0.11",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 78
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-06",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job experience (years))",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.18",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "a5581608092d8495",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 6: Job experience (years) 0.18",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 79
   },
   {
    "id": "c017a9ff740fa1c1",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "Job experience (years)          0.18        Years of experience in the job correlates only slightly with the job",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 39
   },
   {
    "id": "1eaa462430b3aee7",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "experience (validity of 0.18).",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 44
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-07",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Reference checks)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.26",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2cca084c5449d931",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 7: Reference checks 0.26",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 80
   },
   {
    "id": "4185eb9988ee5a62",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "Reference checks                           0.26     Contacting previous employers is a valid method, as past",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 41
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-08",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Conscientiousness tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.31",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8130bf94127283c1",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 8: Conscientiousness tests 0.31",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 81
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-09",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Biographical data measures)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.35",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "eadade6ecf68c313",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 9: Biographical data measures 0.35",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 82
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-10",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Assessment centers)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.37",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "348d3bbe0383fed2",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 10: Assessment centers 0.37",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 83
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-11",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Employment interviews (unstructured))",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.38",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "69a46aefc79acbff",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 11: Employment interviews (unstructured) 0.38",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 84
   },
   {
    "id": "04ca435ec7a3ca42",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "Remember, the validity of unstructured interviews is 0.38,",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 60
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-12",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Integrity tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.41",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "96c648e251e0b736",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 12: Integrity tests 0.41",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 85
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-13",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job tryout procedure)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.44",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2b82c5f31cda2024",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 13: Job tryout procedure 0.44",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 86
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-14",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job knowledge tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.48",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "a2f2d59c4e3686d9",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 15: Job knowledge tests 0.48",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 87
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-15",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Peer rating)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.49",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "e652f81c21531272",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 16: Peer rating 0.49",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 88
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-16",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (General mental ability (GMA) tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.51",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "e2ff7a1c6eb81f10",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 17: General mental ability (GMA) tests 0.51",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 89
   },
   {
    "id": "11103375103ea6ca",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "has a 0.51 predictive validity).",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 57
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-17",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Employment interviews (structured))",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.51",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "ffe8292b09dfdad8",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 18: Employment interviews (structured) 0.51",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 90
   },
   {
    "id": "099af1d0ff40a0f7",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "while the validity of structured interviews is 0.51.",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 61
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-A-18",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Work-sample tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "0.54",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5a42f775bb4ea61c",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "PDF FIGURE (img-006.png, page 28) row 19: Work-sample tests 0.54",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 91
   }
  ],
  "note": "one method of TestDome Figure 4 (validity of selection methods): the figure value row and the text sentences stating the same value; footnote 34 names Schmidt and Hunter (1998), whose Table 1 gives this value for this method",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-B",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (the \"medium validity methods\" listed under that heading)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "between 0.2 and 0.45",
  "comparator": "high validity methods",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "cabb4707703ad567",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "The methods below have validity between 0.2 and 0.45",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 40
   }
  ],
  "note": "range statement introducing the medium-validity table",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TD-C",
  "product": "TestDome",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (the five \"high validity methods\")",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "above 0.45",
  "comparator": "all other methods",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "footnote 34: Schmid and Hunter (1998), with a link; \"Hunter34 did a meta-analysis of thousands of studies\"",
    "link": "https://web.archive.org/web/20190109161650/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.172.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf",
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the footnote names the 1998 paper and the values match the 1998 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0ba57a2eaec82ab3",
    "url": "https://www.testdome.com/evidence-based-hiring/content/ebh/ebh-standalone.pdf",
    "sha256": "84572d907bcc32a343615c870020220e3c8285ec8c4c6852ed0ecf5acf33d980",
    "quotation": "Only five methods have a validity above 0.45:",
    "claim_span": null,
    "position": 42
   }
  ],
  "note": "range statement introducing the high-validity table",
  "evidence": "text"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-01",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Structured interview)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".51 (original) and .42 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "89c919b1d4834939",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 1,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Structured interview .51 / .42)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-02",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job knowledge test)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".48 (original) and .40 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "f39f9850946544c3",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 2,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Job knowledge test .48 / .40)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-03",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Empirically keyed biodata)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".35 (original) and .38 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "1f9955c448f96e9f",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 3,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Empirically keyed biodata .35 / .38)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-04",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Work sample test)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".54 (original) and .33 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "b108d016eee414ca",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 4,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Work sample test .54 / .33)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-05",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Cognitive ability)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".51 (original) and .31 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "7d0e62cbdfa6dec0",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 5,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Cognitive ability .51 / .31)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-06",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Integrity test)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".41 (original) and .31 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "fd1d6f53127ba177",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 6,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Integrity test .41 / .31)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-07",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Assessment center)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".37 (original) and .29 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "0a84061c7d09998e",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 7,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Assessment center .37 / .29)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-08",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Interests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".10 (original) and .24 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "ba212a047c6f79eb",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 8,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Interests .10 / .24)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-09",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Conscientiousness)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".31 (original) and .19 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "e6f0e8b13380ddef",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 9,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Conscientiousness .31 / .19)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG1-10",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Unstructured interview)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".38 (original) and .19 (revised)",
  "comparator": "original versus revised estimate",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Schmidt & Hunter (1998)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "1998",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 1998 paper; value matches the 1998 primary text"
   },
   {
    "text": "figure legend: Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the legend names the 2022 paper; value matches the 2022 primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5046ec45add22c3b",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/hiring-tools-validity-revisited/",
    "page_sha256": "5a04201f3bbdac39f50029832fbb844f75b9cc470761fb6d7776a1b1adf613ea",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5ca1e3742e6.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:56Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/WwWXIFnjqPD7L4ANfZCUB/d79ff2affc251df925366a0208872b77/Original-revised-validity-estimates.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5d500ee916f4.img",
    "image_sha256": "af7da7d98f18a3143cf11541f51c358a46bc6a9f9600d3ce490d2feb27407c92",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:46Z",
    "position": 10,
    "quotation": "(figure row: Unstructured interview .38 / .19)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from the figure \"Original and revised validity estimates for different hiring tools\", read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-01",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Employment interviews, structured)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".42 (80% credibility interval .18 to .66)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "526b81c72aa9d850",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 1,
    "quotation": "(table row: Employment interviews, structured .42 .18 to .66)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-02",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job knowledge tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".40 (80% credibility interval .23 to .57)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2c3a0f8df1e6b885",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 2,
    "quotation": "(table row: Job knowledge tests .40 .23 to .57)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-03",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Empirically keyed biodata)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".38 (80% credibility interval .26 to .50)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "5ea44b92230831c3",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 3,
    "quotation": "(table row: Empirically keyed biodata .38 .26 to .50)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-04",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Work sample tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".33 (80% credibility interval .21 to .45)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8711b626586ec4ba",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 4,
    "quotation": "(table row: Work sample tests .33 .21 to .45)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-05",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Cognitive ability tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".31 (80% credibility interval .13 to .49)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "d7a23e6c132f467a",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 5,
    "quotation": "(table row: Cognitive ability tests .31 .13 to .49)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-06",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Integrity tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".31 (80% credibility interval .05 to .57)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "531ce71cd280f8f8",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 6,
    "quotation": "(table row: Integrity tests .31 .05 to .57)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-07",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Personality-based emotional intelligence)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".30 (80% credibility interval .08 to .52)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "f40edd63c6f19df6",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 7,
    "quotation": "(table row: Personality-based emotional intelligence .30 .08 to .52)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-08",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Assessment centers)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".29 (80% credibility interval .17 to .41)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "6f0fa6e65922f29f",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 8,
    "quotation": "(table row: Assessment centers .29 .17 to .41)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-09",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (SJT, knowledge)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".26 (80% credibility interval .13 to .39)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2524df268bfde192",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 9,
    "quotation": "(table row: SJT, knowledge .26 .13 to .39)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-10",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (SJT, behavioral tendency)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".26 (80% credibility interval .11 to .41)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "c4bbfa7954320653",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 10,
    "quotation": "(table row: SJT, behavioral tendency .26 .11 to .41)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-11",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Conscientiousness, contextualized)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".25 (80% credibility interval .25 to .25)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2162b46dfd92da87",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 11,
    "quotation": "(table row: Conscientiousness, contextualized .25 .25 to .25)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-12",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Interests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".24 (80% credibility interval -.08 to .56)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "2219be9c3de8590c",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 12,
    "quotation": "(table row: Interests .24 -.08 to .56)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-13",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Emotional stability, contextualized)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".23 (80% credibility interval .10 to .36)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "18cb2ab5c0d5e967",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 13,
    "quotation": "(table row: Emotional stability, contextualized .23 .10 to .36)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-14",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Ability-based emotional intelligence)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".22 (80% credibility interval .16 to .28)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "ccfe576f0bd70d74",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 14,
    "quotation": "(table row: Ability-based emotional intelligence .22 .16 to .28)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-15",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Rationally keyed biodata)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".22 (80% credibility interval .14 to .30)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "d7b7bb47f466bcf9",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 15,
    "quotation": "(table row: Rationally keyed biodata .22 .14 to .30)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-16",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Extraversion, contextualized)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".21 (80% credibility interval .11 to .31)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8dfb352b09e7ca3e",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 16,
    "quotation": "(table row: Extraversion, contextualized .21 .11 to .31)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-17",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Conscientiousness, overall)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".19 (80% credibility interval .02 to .38)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "3b11c7ea6b11b516",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 17,
    "quotation": "(table row: Conscientiousness, overall .19 .02 to .38)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-18",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Employment interviews, unstructured)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".19 (80% credibility interval -.01 to .39)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "570f4e2e2600bb65",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 18,
    "quotation": "(table row: Employment interviews, unstructured .19 -.01 to .39)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-19",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Agreeableness, contextualized)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".19 (80% credibility interval .02 to .36)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "6e4132e3270aa33a",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 19,
    "quotation": "(table row: Agreeableness, contextualized .19 .02 to .36)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-20",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Openness to experience, contextualized)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".12 (80% credibility interval .12 to .12)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "c09e57f935692aa5",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 20,
    "quotation": "(table row: Openness to experience, contextualized .12 .12 to .12)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-21",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Extraversion, overall)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".10 (80% credibility interval -.06 to .25)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "8569d2d5aa8b6537",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 21,
    "quotation": "(table row: Extraversion, overall .10 -.06 to .25)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-22",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Agreeableness, overall)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".10 (80% credibility interval -.08 to .27)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "55f8006d6060230c",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 22,
    "quotation": "(table row: Agreeableness, overall .10 -.08 to .27)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-23",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Emotional stability, overall)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".09 (80% credibility interval -.01 to .19)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "198db08c2ce61fd2",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 23,
    "quotation": "(table row: Emotional stability, overall .09 -.01 to .19)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-24",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Job experience (years))",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".07 (80% credibility interval -.07 to .21)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "1af52dee37effb56",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 24,
    "quotation": "(table row: Job experience (years) .07 -.07 to .21)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "TG-IMG2-25",
  "product": "TestGorilla",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "job performance (Openness to experience, overall)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".05 (80% credibility interval -.03 to .14)",
  "comparator": "none",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "table caption: Adapted from Sackett et al. (2022)",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": true,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": false
    },
    "lineage": "2022",
    "lineage_basis": "the caption names the 2022 paper; value matches the primary text"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "54e728725d15e0a0",
    "url": "https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/science-hiring-tools-validity-revisited-two/",
    "page_sha256": "ae288fef26bedd9bd28b35a06f1713b7816bf5d69e8cb784901aa375bbcfd9e1",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/testgorilla/b5e869e8406b.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:42:53Z",
    "image_src": "https://images.ctfassets.net/vztl6s0hp3ro/2S3DOslCbA7hgBUrEOLgFO/a20910e88aeaa4d6105d868514c0ac8d/Table-1.-Validity-coefficients-and-their-variability-for-different-hiring-tools.jpg",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/5b0a5ae6c7cf.img",
    "image_sha256": "fcbb993799c9d2343cbfb717fa8c15f300091e02745feea57e993ec713c7ccfb",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:39:45Z",
    "position": 25,
    "quotation": "(table row: Openness to experience, overall .05 -.03 to .14)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim from Table 1, read by eye after OCR",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-01",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Multi-measure tests (cognitive ability plus personality plus interests))",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".71+",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "c38d499239a6dbe3",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 1,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Multi-measure tests (cognitive ability plus personality plus interests) .71+)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-02",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Cognitive ability tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".65",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "62ff9ccddb26533e",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 2,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Cognitive ability tests .65)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-03",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Integrity tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".46",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "34351e274795011a",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 3,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Integrity tests .46)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-04",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Reference checks)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".26",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "7af7cb72cd93c038",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 4,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Reference checks .26)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-05",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Emotional intelligence tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".24",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "1d4bf8c81f5b7bc5",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 5,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Emotional intelligence tests .24)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-06",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Personality tests)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": "up to .22",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "fcd90e1e852a7952",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 6,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Personality tests up to .22)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 },
 {
  "id": "WL-IMG1-07",
  "product": "Wonderlic Select",
  "kind": "primary",
  "claim_target": "general construct",
  "criterion": "predicted job performance (Job experience)",
  "metric_type": "validity coefficient or correlation",
  "value": ".13",
  "comparator": "other selection practices in the same graphic",
  "sources": [
   {
    "text": "graphic credited HBR.ORG, \"Source: based on data shared by Frank L Schmidt in a Nov 6, 2013 address to PTCMW as an update to: Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998)\"",
    "link": null,
    "identifiable": true,
    "gated": false,
    "source_type": {
     "academic": false,
     "vendor_technical_report": false,
     "customer_or_case_study": false,
     "other_third_party": true
    },
    "lineage": "other",
    "lineage_basis": "the graphic names its data source (a 2013 address described as an update to the 1998 paper); the values differ from the 1998 primary text, so the 1998 flag is not set; coded lineage other with the 1998 reference recorded here"
   }
  ],
  "occurrences": [
   {
    "id": "547eaba231633d98",
    "url": "https://wonderlic.com/blog/human-resources/data-driven-candidate-research-for-better-hiring/",
    "page_sha256": "7004e3c5589383d03d8dec7d28450f03117d27f5c4f18e75ff80e6cfd0139fde",
    "page_saved": "raw/checked-2026-09-02/wonderlic-select/100ffb13a241.html",
    "page_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T11:44:25Z",
    "image_src": "https://wp-cdn.wonderlic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png",
    "image_saved": "raw/images-2026-09-02/ab6c4afd7ef5.img",
    "image_sha256": "642680ef8243011161cea0b0fe5a59ed197f8070627afc8e4dd61f4fbaa58201",
    "image_fetched_utc": "2026-09-02T12:40:22Z",
    "position": 7,
    "quotation": "(graphic row: Job experience .13)"
   }
  ],
  "note": "image-only claim on a Wonderlic blog page: the graphic \"The most effective hiring selection practices\", read by eye after OCR; the page text around the image carries validity words, which is how the image inventory flagged it",
  "evidence": "image"
 }
]